A comprehensive guide to the TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making

Mitra Madanchian, Hamed Taherdoost

Abstract

One common multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique is the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), which is frequently applied in several application fields. Finding an ideal and an anti-ideal solution, which are then utilized to determine the distances between the alternatives and the ideal solution, is the foundation of the TOPSIS approach. The method then ranks the alternatives according to their closeness to the ideal solution. TOPSIS is able to handle both quantitative and qualitative criteria, however, the method can be sensitive to the weight of the criteria, and the ranking results can be influenced by the choice of the reference alternatives. This paper provides an overview of the TOPSIS method, its applications, main characteristics and limitations. The paper also provides step-by-step instructions on how to apply the TOPSIS method, including the determination of the criteria weights, the construction of the decision matrix, and the calculation of the TOPSIS scores.

Keywords

decision making; multi-criteria decision making; Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution; TOPSIS method

References

Habenicht W, Scheubrein B, Scheubrein R. Multiple-criteria decision making. Optimization and Operations Research 2002; 4: 257–279. Velasquez M, Hester PT. An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Operations Research 2013; 10(2): 56–66. Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey. Springer; 1981. Volume 186. Shih HS, Shyur HJ, Lee ES. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2007; 45(7–8): 801–813. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023 Tsaur RC. Decision risk analysis for an interval TOPSIS method. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2011; 218(8): 4295–4304. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.10.001 Behzadian M, Otaghsara SK, Yazdani M, Ignatius J. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications 2012; 39(17): 13051–13069. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056 Shukla A, Agarwal P, Rana R, Purohit R. Applications of TOPSIS algorithm on various manufacturing processes: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings 2017; 4(4): 5320–5329. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.05.042 Yadav SK, Joseph D, Jigeesh N. A review on industrial applications of TOPSIS approach. International Journal of Services and Operations Management 2018; 30(1): 23–28. doi: 10.1504/IJSOM.2018.091438 Xu Q, Zhang YB, Zhang J, Lv XG. Improved TOPSIS model and its application in the evaluation of NCAA basketball coaches. Modern Applied Science 2015; 9(2): 259. doi: 10.5539/mas.v9n2p259 Li X, Liu Z, Peng Q. Improved algorithm of TOPSIS model and its application in river health assessment (Chinese). Advanced Engineering Sciences 2011; 43(2): 14–20. Çelikbilek Y, Tüysüz F. An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis. Journal of Management Analytics 2020; 7(2): 281–300. doi: 10.1080/23270012.2020.1748528 Papathanasiou J, Ploskas N. TOPSIS Multiple Criteria Decision Aid: Methods, Examples and Python Implementations. Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 1–30.